Politically Correct *updated*
Tuesday, February 26th, 2008*this is a space saved for the time i spent thinking about which category this should be in*
anyway.
was having lunch the other day with a bunch of friends when the conversation topic started moving into the realm of the world’s current most notorious race; the US election. when asked which of the democrat candidate a male friend prefers, he mentioned the BO. i nodded. but then male friend felt compelled to enlighten things further. because he believed that the woman should not hold a leadership position on that level. why? because she’s a woman.
ummm…
why? because a woman who’s able to reach that high a position must be one with a talent of manipulation and iron will. another female friend *gasp* supported the notion. saying that in organisations or societies as a whole, women on high places are generally (an adjective i freely adopt) more vicious and less fair to their subordinates or even the people around them. so i told them about a certain article i read last year in regards to some research done on the perception of men and women in workplaces. for the same managerial decisions, men often become more favoured and liked and thought wiser rah rah rah. when those decisions screwed up, the unaffected shall watch with sympathy. women? shunned. for every public tearing-up, women would be deemed as emotionally unstable. men? oh-so-sensitive. with these kinds of perceptions running rampage, wouldn’t it be more logical for carreer-minded women to adopt the dead set visage and work twice as hard for the sake of crawling up the corporate ladder? so they bitch up the game a little bit. so what? they are the ones cursed with monthly periods damn it. i’m not much of a feminist. but if the good Lord advocates mortal freewill, who the hell are we to go against it? and come to think of it, it will only be a little while before i plunge into that vicious cycle. women rough up their acts? women are seen as less capable and stuff? chicken? egg? i personally don’t mind women being seen that way. not that much. but people should just cut the crap on heralding workplace equality. i mean, come on, that’s like some high-school cruel jokes, isn’t it?
ah well, seems that ambition is only the rights of men.
ps: this entry does not in any way reflect that of my candidate inclination in regards to the democratic election (not that it friggin’ matters anyway). but i have the belief that people’s capabilities should not be judged by who they are, rather by what they can do. i won’t make a fuss if the said male friend reasoned something along the line of not feelin’ the woman’s policy proposals. but then that and pointing out how women in the workplaces generally act (like and AS IF it’s their fault, something that can actually be helped)…is just too plain ignorant. but it’s like what they say about women: damned if you do, damned if you don’t.
if you get my drift…